I have always hated standardized tests. Sure, there argon many different types of standardized tests. The SAT, the ACT that are devoted to every last(predicate) students and the numerous AP exams that are prepared with a more exclusive audience in mind. But theyre all basically flawed.
The point of a standardized test, as near as I can figure it out, is to give colleges, government officials, and likely employers an idea of what sort of person they are dealing with. That is elegant; there arent many ways to evaluate large numbers racket of people quickly without resorting to some form of prepackaged sets of questions to be answered in a structured format in provided a few short hours.
And if everyone who dealt with standardized tests realized this, and knew that they were a best rough approximations of the truth, I would not be make-up this essay. (Well, I still might, because I have a interpersonal chemistry midterm that I am putting off, but I digress...) However, teachers, schools, politicians and employers alike generally share the conviction that tests are furthest more important than they really are, and believe that they can check off enough about a person by how closely they play the game of the test maker.
This is dangerous, because some people are very good at manipulating the system, or serveing others to (and all for a fee, of course, which is doubly dangerous due to its inherent discrimination). chalk up to that the number of computer programs written and books published solely to help a student gain a higher score, and the proliferation of supposedly college-level AP classes structured and taught for the test and for the test only and with only move consideration for how a subject might be taught for its consume intrinsic merit, and it is evident that...
If you want to get a expert essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment