My Philosophy change is a challenge Essay

I. Introductionmilitary personnel needs philosophy in order to be able to think, do work and live accordingly. It is a basic blueprint of a mans actions from thinking, to interacting with others. The only thing that is constant is swop.This saying is indeed true specially in the Philippine Education System. For every change implemented lies challengers on the part of the classroom t from each oneers who portrays varied roles. The rapid changes in the world cast made course of study design horizontal to a greater extent difficult. to be globally militantII. Aims of my Philosophy chosenThere is a need to retool the syllabus from time to time for us to suit the needs of time. We should go on with the flow of life and we should revise it now beca subroutine computer platform in the yesteryear is non anymore very effective or suit for todays generationAs pro active exclusive I consider Change as a challenge and not a threat. Meeting new challenges require the opportunity to take risks and separate out new ideas. As a learning individual change is unavoidable to meet the needs of companionship. In a fast changing society education is one fashion to connect oneself to the past and to project into the future and therefore aims in Philosophy should be considered.III. Role of Philosophy chosen to EducationEducation and philosophy are closely tied in concert both are associated with commandment, learning, and disc all overing. Philosophy is more of an all-encompassing part of life, though education is a more specific form of it. Due to the contributions of philosophers over the centuries, education has developed into the powerful tool that it is today. Without philosophy, education would essentially not exist. That said importance of philosophy in education is in detail the foundation in which all academic teaching and intellectual learning is built off.IV. Role of Philosophy to the nitty-gritty maturement1. It guides everyone to plan collabora tively for civilise change to meet the learners diverse needs 2. It serves as a vehicle to open new ideas for positive outcomes 3 It strengthens the goals on meeting challenges for a fully functional learner.Language is dynamic as well as the syllabus. We fix different curriculum in the past and in the present. We are now in a globally competitive world. A world that also needs competitive teachers and students. So, how will you wrench competitive if your curriculum is traditional? And is not aware of the new trends of teaching today?Students now are fond of using computers. They will plausibly choose going to the computer shop than going to school. As a teacher, what will you do? Dont be a s oftentimesed teacher An effective way of solving this kind of phenomena is that the teachers must use technology in teaching. Make it as your partner in delivering a lesson so that the students will not get bored. Make a teaching-learning offset lively and meaningful.Teaching and learnin g give life and meaning to the curriculum because this is the process wherein the teacher and the students interact with each other interchangeably or vice versa. If there is an effective teaching-learning process, its reallyly a stupendous help to the curriculum. Its a big honor because each complements and supplements each other. The value placed in teaching will reap the resembling value in learning. Thus, a better curriculum can be judged by the kind if teaching and the quality of learning derived from it.The most authoritative thing to keep in mind about strategic content development is that its truly an improvisational process. The reason why you want to detect as many viable options for potentially remarkable content is simplistic Youll almost certainly need to make adjustments on the process, and its easier to do that when youve already identified alternatives. So, the final aspect of strategic content development is to constantly evaluate what happened along the way, and why. The most valuable lessons are often found in the things that didnt work, so treat it all as a learning experience that keeps your content constantly fresh and cost talking about.V. Significant effect of this curriculum development to the current trends in attaining universal truth in Educational ProcessIn 2012 Depeds K 12 Program goes full blast. Brother Armin Luistro has described the capital punishment of the universal primary or pre-school education in the Philippines as the delimitate moment in the administration of President Aquino as it seeks to implement reforms with loggerheaded impact on the welfare of Philippine children and the youth. DepEds enhanced curriculum aims to meet the overall objective of preparing children for productive work, either as employees or entrepreneurs, while maintaining its current academic thrustIt seems that the President is rushing this broadcast before his term ends. If this program is not implemented well, we might not achieve our real objectives. And all we have done is to disrupt the livelong system. Changing programs and implementing new ones is not cheap. Will the next President change the system again?In a survey conducted by SWS from Aug. 24 to 27 last year showed growing acceptability of the key features of the K-12 program compared to survey results in March 2012. About 72 percent of Filipino adults believe that K-12 will give students more sufficient knowledge and formulation for work and college compared to those who finished 10 years of basic education, garnering a unclutter rating of +48, up from +35 last March.The percentage of Filipinos who believe that more students will be encouraged to finish the twain-year SHS because it is equivalent to cardinal years of college hit 69 percent, or a 10- point plus from 59 percent in March.The results showed that 68 percent of Filipinos with a net rating of +39 believe that more students will finish SHS even with the additional cost and number of ye ars because K-12 graduate will be better prepared for work, higher education, and business. The results of the survey didnt even reach 75% which means some(prenominal) are not amenable to the new program. Although the marketing point of K to 12 is the assurance that graduates of Senior High cultivate will be able to work immediately, even before or without seeking a college degreeUnder certain circumstances, it is possible to revise only the high school curriculum. Even in this case, we have to delay until those already in First Year have finished stern Year (under the present system).After drawing up a curriculum on paper (including such things as expected competencies, prerequisites, qualifications, learning areas, scope, coverage, and outcomes), curriculum designers have to think about the textbooks and other instructional materials that will have to be created for the new or revised subjects. Although teacher training is a separate process, curriculum designers also have to give pointers on how teachers should be trained to handle the subjects. There also has to be some way to determine if and when the curriculum needs to be revised this is called program discernment or evaluation.Because of abrupt implementation teachers are really having a terrible time coping with the changes not to mention the lack of classrooms, instructional materials and the real physical situation of the learners. If the government can financially sustain the program without adding too much burden on parents, its worth broad it a try.However, nowadays, most of the students are the happy-go-lucky types who do not run into education as their priority. Theyd rather bum around in malls or stay glued to computers. As a result, most graduates are half-baked, who cant even write or speak good English, unlike the students of yesteryears. forwards, a Grade 6 pupils then could already teach. An additional two years to the basic education curriculum could spell two more years of bur den to poor parents who could hardly send their children to school.Before full implementation, there usually is a year-long pilot to debug the curriculum, as well as a longer transition period at bottom which some students will be following the old curriculum and some following the new.Curriculum should not only focus on the tools essential to develop reasoned and logical construction of new knowledge in our various fields of study, but also should aggressively cultivate a culture that nurtures creativity in all of our learners. This point seems particularly important.