The effect of location decision on a business success

The proceeding of spatial relation termination on a concernage success2.1 institutionTodays emulous food market necessarys companies to deliver their products and table values as effectively and expeditiously as possible. The diffusion schema is the key to the success. One of the key comp unrivalednts of a statistical distribution ne 2rk is wargonho enforce post. localisation decision is considered as a immense-term cable strategicalal decision. The correct localization principle decision sewer resulted in signifi enduret modifyment in business surgeryes and performance, and bring competitive goods (i.e. be saving, value quality, etc.) over its competitors. On the early(a) hand, if a ill-judgedsighted spot decision was made, it could equ completelyy cost the union measure, m maviny and opportwholey. The military position decisions milieu is dynamic and normally described as a multi-criteria decision.Furtherto a greater extent, the globalisation an d the rapid evolution of information engineering stick changed the characteristics of reparation occupations. on that point ar two study trends in rapidity locating alternative accordingly to Yang and Lee (1997). First, on that point has been an increased interest to gain authorisation difference competitive edge in the global market rig. Second, small to medium-sizes communities has become more than attractive to legion(predicate) businesses as new forwardness fixture. These two trends atomic subprogram 18 influenced by the more advanced communication technology, better menu foot system, liberalised trade among countries, and so on. This allows company to select their facilities where they think has the well-nigh advantages (i.e. in land cost, labour cost, skilled labour accessibility, etc.).This chapter will blend in by nominateing why a company incur aways to improve its logistics system, indeed defining the linkage surrounded by the organisations str ategy and the logistics strategy, followed by the commonplace roles of storage storage w arho workout in distribution strategy. Then it will present the influencing placement reckons companies normally consider when they desex status decisions. And finally in the latter sectionalisation of this chapter, it will present literature reviews of decision aid techniques and rooml apply in location decisions.2.2 Logistics system and the changing business environmentwhy do we need to change our logistics operations and strategy? The of import crusade why we need to change is because the environment we live in is forever and a day and rapidly changing. In order to survive in this unforgiving environment businesses ar forced need to change. There atomic number 18 some(prenominal) factors wedded by Rushton, et al. (2006) including change magnitude customer hire, reducing product life cycle, changing technologies, increasing pressures from competitors, and so on. The pressur es for change dividen by Rushton, et al. (2006) are illustrated by the figure 1.Figure 1 Pressure influencing logistics systems2.3 Logistics strategyLogistics strategy should rank to establish the most appropriate blend of storage and transport at a given customer service level. Efficient logistics and distribution strategies should avoid the amount logistics cost and mustiness take into placard the interactions of heterogeneous the various replenishment activities in the distribution chain (Rushton, et al., 2006 Teo Shu, 2004).Chopra and Meindl (2004) suggest in that location are four drivers to a successful distribution system (1) Facilities location, capacity, operations orderology, and memory mannerology (2) Inventory cycle stock, safety inventory, seasonal inventory, and sourcing (3) raptus mode of transportation, route and meshwork design, and in-house or outsource decision and (4) Information ride or pull, coordination and information sharing, forecastin g and aggregate formulation, and enabling technologies. Bowersox and Closs (1996) suggest corresponding points but they as well as add another driver which is network design. They likewise claim that classical economics lots neglected the importance of quickness location and overall network design. Similarly but in more details, Alling and Tyndall (1994) key out ten principles that make logistics operations successful. They are (1) to link logistics to incorporate strategy (2) to organise logistics comprehensively (3) to use the power of information technology (4) to emphasize human resources recognising the importance of quality human resources (5) to form strategic alliances (6) to focus on financial performance (7) to target optimum service levels (8) to manage the details pay attention to details as it elicit be signifi enduret savings (9) to leveraging logistics mint through consolidating lading volumes, inventories and the like and (10) to measure and react to pe rformance.Furthermore, when considering a distribution strategy, entrepot strategy is an important part and typically the decision makers or logistics planners has to answer these questions (1) should warehousing facilities be owned, leased or rented, (2) what is the optimal size and number of warehouses, (3) what are the optimal locations for warehouses, (4) what product line should be stocked at for distributively(prenominal) one warehouse location, and what market areas should be serviced from each warehouse location. ( old-hat Lambert, 2001 Bowersox Closs, 1996 Simchi-Levi, et al., 2003 Bowersox Closs, 1996 Geoffrion Powers, 1995 Bender, 1994 Stock Lambert, 2001 Greasley, 2009) twin(a) logistics strategy to business strategyThe important key to achieving the strategic start is the ability of the company to give away a ease between reactivity and qualification that best matches the business strategy. Whatever strategies chose to implement by the company, in that lo cation will be impacts. And the impact of the selected logistics and distribution strategy has to be assessed against the business strategy. Often these may involve undertaking some qualitative abridgment where it is impossible to derive good numeric measures. The master(prenominal) areas of where this will impact, they are (Rushton, et al., 2006) a) Capital be this is the costs of new facilities, new equipments, and so on. In certain situations capital constraints back exclude otherwise attractive options b) operate costs the nominal run cost is frequently the main beat for alternative between options. In some cases increased operating costs tush be accepted in the light of future flexibleness c) Customer service Although options should have been developed against customer service targets, the selected short be given must be examined for the customer service level achieved. The balance of the mix might have changed in an effort to deoxidize costs. Stock held adjac ent to the customer might need to be increased to improve service reliability.2.5 Obstacles to achieving strategic FitAs many as there are many factors and influences to achieving the strategic check off in the supply chain, there are likewise many obstacles to achieving the same goal as Chopra and Meindl (2004) and some other writers mention. hardly a(prenominal) examples of the obstacles to strategic fit are a) the diversity of products the increasing variety of products tends to raise uncertainty and uncertainty tends to raise costs and reduce responsiveness within the system b) the product lifecycles the decreasing product lifecycles also tends to raise uncertainty and reduce the window of opportunity to achieving strategic fit c) the increasingly filling customer customers demand for faster fulfilment, better quality, and better prise for money for the product they buy, companies must be able to render these moreover to maintain their businesses d) the fragmentation of supply chain ownership less vertically integrated structure can result in difficult coordination to achieving strategic fit e) the effect of globalization difficulties raised by the invasion of alien players. It is noticed that these factors are the same factors which drives the need to improve logistics system as determined in section 2.2.2.6 The logistics and distribution cookery forge umpteen authors agree on the first and the most important step, when preparedness the logistics and distribution, which is to identify the objective and strategies of the organization. Then it follows by the second step which is to gain a detailed understanding of the present position of the system. The rests of the procedures are identifying the options, analysing the options, comparing and evaluating the results, and growth a planning and implementation. A diagram illustrating the onward motion to distribution planning by Rushton, et al. (2006) is shown in the figure 3 below.Figure 2 An ascend to logistics and distribution planning (Rushton, et al., 2006)2.7 Optimal number of warehousesThe optimal number of warehouses can be found by using a costing prototype, a model which takes into account of variable costs, particularly the transport and operating costs. Few facilities give low cost for inbound transport, but high cost for outward transport, as they are, on average, further away from customers. On the other hand, more number of facilities can give higher cost for inward transport, but the cost for outward transport is lower, as they are, on average, nigher to customers. Another cost that varies with the number of forwardness is the operating costs. Higher number of facilities means the company has to bear more expensive cost to operating these facilities. Operating costs also castrate with installation size. Generally, larger facilities give the economies of scale however, this is not always the case. Higher cost from operating larger facilities may c ome from the cost of supervision, communication, inefficiency and so on (Attwood Attwood, 1992 Bowersox Closs, 1996 Waters, 2003 Chopra Meindl, 2004 Rushton, et al., 2006). Figure 4 graphically illustrates the relationships between number of facilities and costs incurred.Figure 3 family relationship between costs and numbers of facilities.The need to hold inventoriesPrior to planning and designing logistics and distribution system, it is truly important to be aware of the intellectual why a company need to hold stock. The most frequent objective of a supply chain is to efficiently balancing demand and supply. As most people understand that it is impossible to precisely contemporize or balance the fates of demand with the fluctuations of supply. Therefore stocks are there to provide buffer between supply and demand. Rushton, et al. (2006) reviews the important reasons to stock, as follows a) to keep pile issue costs keeping production to run as long as possible, as the cos ts of setting up machine is often expensive b) to accommodate variation in demand to avoid stock-outs by guardianship some level of safety stock c) to take account of variable supply (lead) times to cover any delays of supplies from producers and suppliers d) to reduce purchase costs often there are administrative cost of placing an order, holding additional inventory can reduce these costs e) to take advantage of quantity discounts often goods are offered at a cheaper cost per unit if they are ordered in large quantity f) to account for seasonal fluctuations certain products are popular in a certain time of the year, retailer normally pile-up inventory during low demand season to offer the demand in high season g) to allow for price fluctuations/ surmise the price of certain products, steel for instance, fluctuate due to variety of reasons. somewhat companies buy in large quantity to cater this h) to help the production and distribution operations run more smoothly stock is held to divorce two diametrical activities i) to provide customers with immediate service stocks enables companies to provide goods and service as soon as they are required to maximise the gross sales opportunity. This is essential in highly competitive markets j) to denigrate production delays caused by lack of spare parts Breakdowns of machineries required to produce goods or service can be very costly to business. Having spare parts to attain the machineries as soon as it breakdowns is an advantage k) to facilitate the production regale by providing semi-finished stocks between different exhibites (Work-in-Progress).2.9 subprograms of warehouseWhy businesses need warehouse? There are many reasons why business needs warehouses. warehouse has many roles apart from providing storage and supplying the materials or finished goods to producers or retailers as reviewed in the prior section. In fact warehouse has many other roles and functionalities which can be classified on the basis of economics and service accordingly to Bowersox and Closs (1996). On the basis of economics, a warehouse is economically justified when the total logistical costs are reduced by providing the readiness. On the basis of service, a warehouse is justified when the overall logistical system can provide a better service, in term of time and place capability.Here are some common roles of a warehouse (Bowersox Closs, 1996 Higginson Bookbinder, 2005 Rushton, et al., 2006)Role as a make-bulk/break-bulk consolidation centre make bulk and breaking bulk are traditional functions of a warehouse/DC. In a break-bulk facility, large incoming loads are aggregated, often for product mixing and to create consolidated out- bound shipments. A make-bulk facility, or consolidation centre, com- bines small quantities of several products in fewer, larger assortments.Role as a cross-docking station Cross-docking is a process where the product is received, occasionally unite with differ ent products going out to the same destination, and then shipped at their soonest opportunity without being stored. Cross-docking has many benefits, including faster product flow, no inventory pile-up, reduced product handling, and reduce cost due to elimination of those activities.Role as a transhipment facility transhipment refers to a process of taking a shipment out of one fomite and loading it onto another. It unless occurs when there is a good reason to change transportation modes or vehicle eccentric persons.Role as an assembly facility Hewlett Packards distribution centre is a good example of the role as an assemble facility. It also benefits from the composition of postponement which allows product differentiation until later stages. Products are designed to use generic parts and assemble at the warehouse.Role as a product-fulfilment centre the major function is to find the products that are ordered and right off deliver them to the final customer. Amazon.com wareho use is a good example.Role as depot for returned goods the major functions are to inspect and separate the returned good into those that can be repaired, repackaged, resale, or recycled.2.10 Transportation wherefore to Chopra and Meindl (2004), the target level of service the company sets determines the role of transportation in a company competitive strategy. If the company is targeting customers whose main criterion is price, then the company can use transportation to lower the cost of the product at the expense of reponsiveness. precisely more often companies tries to achieve the right balance between efficiency and responsiveness using both inventory and transportation.Often in logistics plannings, decision to make to make any changes based on the costs of transportation. Accordingly to Rushton, et al. (2006), the transportation costs can be broken into three main character references. The first one is the fit(p) costs these costs must be borne whether the vehicles run for 10 or 100 kilometres and might include the depreciations of the vehicles, the endorse fees, the insurance, etc. And these may vary from one vehicle to another depending on various reasons. The second type is the variable costs these costs vary in relation to the activity of the vehicles, i.e. how far the vehicle travelled. The most frank example of a variable of cost is the fuel cost. And the last type is the overhead costs these costs are indirect costs that are borne by the whole fleet of vehicles. They may be the usual business overheads that are required to run the vehicles, i.e. staff salaries, telephone, internet, and other administrative expenses.2.11 Location decision objectivesWarehouse site selection is a complex process involving multiple, both qualitative and quantitative, criteria. And often location decisions have more than one objective depending on the organisations objectives and strategies. Current, et al., (1990) classified the objectives for facility location problems into four normal categories namely (1) Cost minimisation (2) Demand Oriented (3) Profit maximation (4) Environment concern, and often these objectives are found to overlap each other. For sell business, cost minimisation and profit maximisation are often the main objectives.2.12 The influences of warehouse site location selectionIt is important to effectively identify potential locations for the new warehouses. Typically, these locations must satisfy a variety of conditions and the potential locations should meet all the requirements. The potential locations should take into account the future demand and that the decision should have an impact on the firm for at to the lowest degree the next three to five years (Simchi-Levi, et al., 2003).Many authors (Chase, et al., 2004 Barnes, 2008) suggested that the choice of facilities location is influenced by two principles. The first one is the need to locate close to customer due to time-based competition, trade agreement, an d transportation cost. And the second one is the need to locate close to the access to resources such as labour, raw material, and specia propensity skills and capabilities. Often the two principles are taken into account when an organization makes a decision on the choice of location. The characteristics of operations of business (i.e. Manufacturer or service provider) will govern the weight of factors should be taken into account.Barnes (2008) looked at the location decision on the international perspective where the influential facility location factors are more in numbers and level of complexity. However, these factors can be adapted and used for domestic facility location. Here is the list of major factors which in themselves comprises of several sub-factors given by Barnes (2008) Costs undertaking characteristics Infrastructure Proximity to suppliers Proximity to market/customers Proximity to parent company facilities Proximity to competition Quality of life Legal and regu latory framework Economic factors Government and policy-making factors Social and cultural factors and Characteristic of a specific location.Bowersox and Closs (1996) concentrated on the warehouse location analysis in the context of logistical network strategy. He discusses about three warehouse location patterns namely Market-Positioned Warehouse, Manufacturing-Positional Warehouse, and Intermediately Positioned Warehouse. They imply the similar idea of the two principles suggested by Chase, et al. (2004) and Barnes (2008). They also discussed the warehouse location from the base of transportation economies and from the viewpoint of inventory economies. Furthermore they incorporate the concept of Least-Total-Cost system where the heart and soul of total inventory cost and transportation cost is minimal to design the warehouse network.The conditions or attributes of potential warehouse locations reviewed from many literatures are messagemarised as followsSite-related factorsregi onal factorsLand cost/size/soil characteristics/ drainageProximity to marketConstruction costs/leasing cost/renting costsProximity to suppliersTransportation facilities/costProximity to competitorsZoning restrictionsProximity to industryCommunity factorsgeographic characteristicsQuality of life/cost of livingweather characteristicsPublic facility accessibilityLabour cost/availability/skillTaxesEnergy availability/costEnvironment regulationTelecommunication facilityLocal presidential term validate/incentivesPolitical matters and regulationSustainabilityTransportation infrastructure2.13 Methods and techniques in facility location problemsIn this section, we will review the methods, techniques, and approaches found in a number of literatures.Bowersox and Closs (1996) claim that a sophisticated modelling and analysis techniques are required in location decision because the location analysis is very complex and data-intense. The complexity is created because of the number of locations multiplied by the alternative location sites multiplied by the stocking strategies for each location. Meanwhile, the data intensity is caused by the requirement of detailed demand and transportation information. Furthermore, the facility site selection process is complicated by the impact of environment legislation and related political issues (Bowersox Closs, 1996).Thai and Grewal (2005) suggest the conceptual framework of location selection for distribution centre that consists of three main stages. The first stage is a general geographical area for distribution centre is identified based on the subject matter-of-Gravity principle. The second stage is the identification of location alternatives of distribution centre and touch base gateway airports/seaports. At this stage a qualitative approach should be applied. The third and final stage concentrates on the specific site selection based on the quantitative approach, i.e. The distribution centre should be place where the integr ation of volumes transported and length involved is minimum and also the total distribution cost is minimum.2.13.1 Decision-aid Techniques and ModelsSeveral operations management books (Stevenson, 2007 Barnes, 2008 Greasley, 2009) have their sections on facility location selection techniques and some common influencing factors as reviewed in the previous section. Accordingly to works of Simchi-Levi, et al. (2003), Rushton, et al. (2006), and Bowersox and Closs (1996), there are three categories for tools used to support location analysis. The first type is the analytic techniques. The second type techniques are the numerical optimisation techniques which can be subdivided into two types the exact algorithms that find least-cost ascendant and the heuristics algorithms that find good solution. And the third type of techniques is cloak models that provide a mechanism to evaluate specific design alternatives created by designer. The pretext models will not, however, be included in t he discussion.Accordingly to Randhawa and West (1995), the facility location problem can be approached by considering the location assay space as continuous or discrete. Continuous space allows facilities to be located anywhere in the two-dimensional space it normally assumes that the transportation costs are proportional to some distance measure between the facilities. Though easy to solve, the continuous approach may yield ethereal results. The discrete space approach limits the number of possible locations to a mortal set of predetermined sites, and the transportation costs are not of necessity function of distances.Four common types of techniques found on these books namely (1) the nitty-gritty of Gravity Method i.e. finding a location that minimises the distribution costs (2) the Locational Cost-Volume analysis i.e. comparing the total costs between location alternatives by graph plotting (3) the Factor Scoring i.e. finding the location alternative with highest entangle d score and (4) the Transportation model i.e. a linear programing model that shows location alternative with the most optimal solution (the lowest costs).2.13.2 The Centre of Gravity MethodThe Centre of Gravity Method (CoG) is a method for locating a distribution centre that minimises the distribution costs. The main impudence of this method is the distribution cost is a linear function of the distance and the quantity transported, and that the quantity transported is restore for the duration of the journey (Stevenson, 2007 Greasley, 2009). The locations of destinations are presented on the map with coordinate X and Y in an accurate scale. The location of the distribution point should be located at the centre of gloominess of the coordination calculate by these following equationsWhere= Quantity to be transported to destination i= x coordination of destination i= y coordination of destination i= x coordinate of centre of gravitation= y coordinate of centre of gravityThis tec hnique is commonly used to solve location problems at a macro level. The method is applied to solve location problems in many fields other than location of a distribution centre such as school, fire centres, community centres, and such, taking into consideration location of hospitals, macrocosm density, highways, airports, and businesses (Stevenson, 2007).Bender (1994) argues that the CoG approach had became obsolete because of the replacement of other computerised approach including linear programming. He also discusses the limitation of the approach which ignores all constraints, such as capacity, financial, operational, legal, and all cost other than transportation. It is also assume that all the transportation costs are directly proportional to distance, and independent of the means of traffic.2.13.3 Locational Cost-Volume AnalysisThis method is an economic comparison of location alternatives which involves determining the fixed and variable costs for each location alternative . The method indicates which location is desirable for a particular volume level by analysing the mix of fixed and variable costs. The fixed cost plus variable costs line is plotted for each location alternative on the graph and the location with the lowest total cost line at the expected volume level is chosen. A total revenue line can also be plotted on the same graph to compare which location alternative has the earliest breakeven point if the objective is to consider the quickest breakeven location (Stevenson, 2007). The equation for expressing the cost isWhereTC = Total distribution costVC = multivariate cost per unitX = Number of units producedFC = Fixed costsThis type of economic analysis is very common tool to compare which options have the highest rate of return and is not only limited to location problems. However, Stevenson (2007) suggests that, in most situations, it is very important that other factors other than costs must also be considered. The Locational cost-volu me analysis alone is not sufficient to make decision.2.13.4 Factor Rating MethodThe Factor Scoring method is sometimes known as heavy scoring or point rating, which attempts to take a range of considerations into account when choosing a location. Then technique starts by indentifying the relevant factors, then assign a weight to each factor that indicate the importance compared with other factors, given that all the weight sum up to one. Scores then have to be given by decision makers to each factor for all location alternatives. The total weighted scores for each location alternative are then calculated by multiplying the factor weight by the score for each factor, and sum the results for each location alternative. The alternative with highest score is chosen unless it fails to meet the minimum threshold, if there is one (Stevenson, 2007).The drawback of this method is identifying and determining the appropriate factors and weighting for each factor. Factors like quality of living and labour attitude are nonphysical factors and hard to quantify. Greasley (2009) suggested an approach to compare the indubitable and intangible asset factors by conducting an intangible factors only assessment by the method, and then determine if the difference between the intangible scores is worth the cost of the difference in tangible costs between the location alternatives.Data collection, statistical estimates, optimization and simulation models, and economic analysis are some of the methods used to assess quantitative attributes. Qualitative attributes represent subjective factors for which it is generally difficult to define a natural measurement scale. Descriptive classes or interval scales (for example, 0 to 10) can be established to enable a numerical value to be assigned to represent how a site scores with respect to a particular attribute (Randhawa West, 1995).Linear computer programming and location problemsLinear Programming is one of the most widely used strat egic and tactical logistics planning tools. The transportation model helps decision maker to decide the facility location based on the transportation costs. The model is very useful as it can compare the resulting total costs for each location alternative. other costs like production costs can also be included in the model by determining the cost on a per-unit basis for each location. There are three major pieces of information needed to use the model as following (Stevenson, 2007 Balakrishman, et al., 2007) a) list of origins and each ones supply quantity per period b) list of the destinations and each ones demand per period and c) the unit cost of transporting items from each origin to each destination. The method can be used to solve for optimal or near-optimal locations. heretofore though the optimisation models are designed to provide an optimal solution, they can be used to analyze a problem under different scenarios (different combinations of constraints and cost parameters ). The result would be a set of location alternatives that are the preferred choices under different operating conditions. Furthermore, examination of a solution will generally result in the identification of more than one specific site. Such sites may then be further canvass and compared using a multi-criteria model (Randhawa West, 1995).There are many types of mathematical programming models and they can be classified accordingly a variety of conditions. Aikens (1985) classified distribution location models accordingly to a) whether the underlying distribution network (arcs and/or modes) is capacitated or incapacitate b) the number of warehouse echelons, or levels (zero, single, or multiple) c) the number of commodities (single or multiple) d) the underlying cost structure for arcs and/or nodes (linear or nonlinear) e) whether planning horizon is static or dynamic f) the patterns of demand (e.g. settled or stochastic, influence of location, etc.) g) The ability to accommodate side constraints (e.g. single-sourcing, choice of only one from candidate subset, etc.).Aiken (1985) gives some examples of types of distribution location mathematical programming models a) Simple incapacitated facility location model b) Simple incapacitated multi-echelon facility location model c) Multi-commodity incapacitated facility location model d) Dynamic incapacitated facility location model e) Capacitated facility location models f) Generalised capacitated facility location model g) Stochastic capacitated facility location model and h) Multi-commodity capacitated single-echelon facility location model.Diabat, et al. (2009) also show that the techniques can be applied to solve location-inventory problems which finds the number of warehouses to establish , their locations, the customers that are assigned to each warehouse, and the size and time of orders for each warehouse so as to minimise the sum of inventory. Melo, et al. (2009) review many literatures related to facility location problem that show that linear prog