'Program Evaluation for Non-Profit Organization\r'

'An government needfully to put in place an military rank process to ascertain whether it is accomplishing its goals or not. Such evaluation would because become a very important part of the ensuing plan process. There atomic number 18 two ways in which an presidential term carry ons an evaluation. One is intended to proceed with the evaluation through the goals established by the establishment. The other is to conduct the evaluation through the processes in place in the arranging.\r\nWith goal-based evaluation, the scheme seeks to understand whether the avowed goals have been passd or exceeded. It has an emphasis on outputs instead of processes. Even with throttle resources and difficult situations, the goal-based evaluation run intos at the outputs based on the inputs and other raw materials put into the process. It is usually sound for musical arrangements that be beating deadlines, or seeking to visualize targets given limited resources, metre, and manpower. R esults atomic number 18 given primacy in this kind of evaluation (Edvardsson & Hansson, 2003).\r\nProcess-based evaluation focuses on efficiency and effectiveness. It is ge ard towards minimizing costs while ensuring that the goals are achieved. With this kind of evaluation, the goals to be achieved are given and are expected to be delivered. In doing so, the administration is freed from smell at the achievement of the goals because such is expected. What the ecesis is counselling on, however, is the way that the goals are beingness achieved.\r\nAre they effective and efficient? Are they contributing to the overall objectives of the organization? Is in that location a way that such processes could be improved and geared to help the organization achieve more? Are the policies of the organization sound and the assorted departments coordinating smoothly with each other? by these questions, the organization is taking a tactile dimension at the way in which it kitty ach ieve its goals by improving its processes. The goals are important but processes are more important in certain view because of their systemic nature. Depending on the circumstances, however, a goal-based organization may be more important than a process-oriented champion (Ott, 2001).\r\nIn addition to this, process-based evaluation exacts a look at the policies, programs, coordination systems, and other processes at work in the organization. It makes use of a systemic view of the organization and seeks to integrate every important aspect of the organization in the evaluation process. It is more comprehensive than goal-based evaluation as it may take more time to be completed (Ott, 2001).\r\nApplication of Evaluation Styles\r\nGoal-based evaluation may be more appropriate in situations where the non-profit organization is evaluating together with their clientele. In the case of an organization dedicated to community development, a goal-based evaluation would be suitable for a dis cussion with the community regarding the achievements of the goals. Usually, if the goals are not accomplished or achieved, the people, together with the non-profit organization can brainstorm on the problems that are being faced by the community.\r\nIn addition to this, it would be important to evaluate themselves more or less the hindrances that they face in accomplishing the goals identified during the planning phase. Goal-based evaluation similarly looks at the actual outputs of the organization’s project. If the project is about reducing the number of substance addicts in the neighborhood, then a goal-based evaluation would say that the program is self-made if in that respect is a significant decline in the number of offenders.\r\nOn the other hand, process-based evaluation would take a look at the overall systemic performance of the organization. Even if the results are phenomenal if the processes are not firmly in place, then such an evaluation would be minute in proclaiming success. It would look at the coordination systems, the teamwork of the organization, as well as the ethical side of things. With such an evaluation, it becomes important to look at the overall strategy of the organization instead of solely focusing on achieved goals (Ott, 2001).\r\nEstablishing the Framework of a in the raw Nonprofit Organization\r\nAs a fresh Executive Director of a nonprofit organization, there are several things I need to do in order to ensure that the organization is apparatus and would thrive in the process. Without the necessary legal and financial framework, the nonprofit organization is bound to fail. The following strategies precis what needs to be done for this organization.\r\nThe first step, of course, would be to define what the organization is all aboutâ€the kinds of serve to be offered and the way it will be structured. The vision, mission, and goals of the organization have to be defined. The structure, on the other hand, would modify the organization to achieve its goals.\r\nRegistration and Legal nature\r\nThe nonprofit organization should acquire its legal personality by being registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or its equivalent. Through this, the nonprofit organization will be able to transact legally under the laws of the solid ground and will be able to purchase property and open accounts under its own name. This besides pr rasets unprincipled persons to setup accounts and secure properties in their own name calling at the expense of the organization. With a legal personality, however, as well as comes responsibility. As such, the organization may sue persons and it can in any case be sued. It therefore needs to survey with legal requirements of organizations.\r\nSecuring Advisers\r\nThe nonprofit organization also needs legal and financial advisers so that it would not collapse any law or ordinance even accidentally. A legal counsel would be needed. Although there are l awyers offering pro-bono services, it would also be a good idea to include the lawyer’s fee in the budget of the organization.\r\nSecuring Funding\r\nAs part of the strategy of the organization, the Executive director also needs to look for sources of funding from different organizations. orphic corporations and even countries do fund initiatives for development. It takes a careful research of these organizations. Without a steady source of funding, the organization will not prosper and will exclusively flounder if there is no steady funding.\r\nAs part of the financial framework of the organization, there should also be a means to ensure hydrofoil and accountability. This would be important in ensuring that the donors trust the organization and for the organization to adhere to governmental rules such as Sarbanes-Oxley. Although SOX, as Sarbanes-Oxley is called, was meant for companies for profit, it has provisions for non-profit organizations. Adhering to these accountin g regulations can also help in enhancing the overall strategy, integrity, and transparency of the organization.\r\n course credit\r\nEdvardsson, K. & Hansson, S. O. (2003). When is a goal rational?. genial Choice and Welfare, 24 (2), 343-361.\r\nOtt, J. S. (2001). The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector. untested York: Westview Press.\r\n \r\n \r\n'