Pysch

pysch Kant/Mill The basic differences between deontological moral theories and consequentialist moral theories ar compensate in the names. The consequentialist moral theory states that the worth of a moral act is based on the consequence of that act. Deontology downcast from its greek roots means ethical theory by obligation. Say you are at a restaurant and a women begins to choke on her dinner and lets assume that you are the single one there that knows CPR. The deontologist believe that it is your moral duty to keep back her life.

The consequentialist believe that the consequence of saving her would bring more contentment to the world then not saving her, so the right act would be to save her. So even though both theories have completely different fundamentals, they resulted in the equal act. So does that mean that even if you did it because you felt it was your moral obligation, barely because the act was the act that the consequentialist would have chosen, then the consequentialist ...If you want to farm a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper